Options to consider About GMOs

This world is pathetic we are nothing but a lab experiment we need our own land shut these clowns down this is murder.

Funny. I’ve been eating clean for 5 years and anytime I eat out/eat something GMO I get diarrhea. I eat Non-GMO, Organic only and any everytime I make an exception, diarrhea and cramps/. EVERY SINGLE TIME over a 5 year span with several tests with it.
Guess it’s the poison

YOU ARE SO PAID BY MONSANTO………..ITS SOOO CRYSTAL CLEAR HERE…
THEY ALWAYS FORGET…GROWING ANY KIND OF FOOD WITH DEADLY POISONS….YOU END UP WITH THE SAME DEADLY POISONS….!!!

This problem with GMOs is the company behind it Monsanto has a very dark history. That’s why

The solution has and always will be variey. If in Ireland they would have planted several different types of species of potatoes, a blight could only damage one type while sparing others. In Peru there are over 1000 different types of potatoes thus spreading the risk of contamination.

So we have a scientist that is married to a farmer, hmmm very neutral indeed!

Russian propaganda and meddling https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05/02/dear-gary-ruskin-and-anti-gmoers-stop-being-puppets-putin-11225 https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2018/08/opinion-russian-campaign-spread-anti-vaccine-myths-part-wider-war-science-truth/ https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2018/03/06/russia-tried-turn-america-gmos-agricultural-biotechnology-sow-ideological-discord/

It’s nitrogen that Sucks all the nutrients out of the soil to give us a lovely tomatoes and corn now that field is depleted of its nutrients however it will renew it’s self

Just because science has not been able to prove that GMO’s are bad does not mean they are good. Wile I understand the arguments in favor of GMO’s I cannot ignore the fact that there are to many unpredictable variables that science CAN’T say with 100% certainty that GMO’s are safe right now and specially in the future. Yes, there are all kinds of uncertainties that we all face but monkeying with life is asking for trouble! I also firmly believe that GMO’s from the get-go where driven by greed, just look at Monsanto. They tinker with our food just to make it bigger or more eye appealing which has NOTHING to do with “feed the world”! I think its undeniable that science is a 2 edged sword which has given mankind many wonderful things but it has also brought the entire world some horribly bad things as well. Ultimately its mankind’s blind trust in science alone that WILL result in its self destruction! All one has to do is take a look at the world today and see what science has given us. Was it really worth it?

:C oh please don’t mention the studies done on lab animals that were fed GMO food only and each generation became weaker and or unable to reproduce..due to offspring still births, but do go on using GMO’s and being a corporate shill, Neil DegrASSe

One other major problem is how patent law and private seed saving are affected by patented strains. It creates dependence, and dependence is bad independent of the healthiness of the crop.

Link YOUR bio page for us to compare.

“Neil deGrasse Tyson (/dəˈɡræs/; born October 5, 1958) is an American astrophysicist, author, and science communicator. Since 1996, he has been the Frederick P. Rose Director of the Hayden Planetarium at the Rose Center for Earth and Space in New York City. The center is part of the American Museum of Natural History, where Tyson founded the Department of Astrophysics in 1997 and has been a research associate in the department since 2003.

Tyson studied at Harvard University, the University of Texas at Austin and Columbia University. From 1991 to 1994 he was a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton University. In 1994, he joined the Hayden Planetarium as a staff scientist and the Princeton faculty as a visiting research scientist and lecturer. In 1996, he became director of the planetarium and oversaw its $210 million reconstruction project, which was completed in 2000.

List of awards received by Tyson:[114]

2001 Medal of Excellence, Columbia University, New York City

2004 NASA Distinguished Public Service Medal

2005 Science Writing Award

2007 Klopsteg Memorial Award winner

2009 Douglas S. Morrow Public Outreach Award from the Space Foundation for significant contributions to public awareness of space programs

2009 Isaac Asimov Award from the American Humanist Association[129]

2014 Critics’ Choice Television Award for Best Reality Show Host

2014 Dunlap Prize[130]

2015 Public Welfare Medal from the National Academy of Sciences[131]

2015 Cosmos Award, Planetary Society

2017 Hubbard Medal, National Geographic Society[132]

2017 Stephen Hawking Medal for Science Communication, Starmus[133]

2017 Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album nomination for Astrophysics for People in a Hurry[134]

Honors

2000 Sexiest Astrophysicist Alive, People magazine[135]

2001 asteroid named: 13123 Tyson, renamed from Asteroid 1994KA by the International Astronomical Union

2001 The Tech 100, voted by editors of Crain’s Magazine to be among the 100 most influential technology leaders in New York

2004 Fifty Most Important African-Americans in Research Science[136]

2007 Harvard 100: Most Influential, Harvard Alumni magazine, Cambridge, Massachusetts

2007 The Time 100, voted by the editors of Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential persons in the world[137]

2008 Discover Magazine selected him as one of “The 10 Most Influential People in Science”[138]

Honorary doctorates

1997 York College, City University of New York

2000 Ramapo College, Mahwah, New Jersey

2000 Dominican College, Orangeburg, New York

2001 University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia

2002 Bloomfield College, Bloomfield, New Jersey

2003 Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts

2004 College of Staten Island, City University of New York

2006 Pace University, New York City

2007 Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts

2007 Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts

2008 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

2010 University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama

2010 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York

2010 Eastern Connecticut State University, Willimantic, Connecticut

2011 Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania

2012 Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts

2012 Western New England University, Springfield, Massachusetts

2015 University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts

2017 Baruch College, New York, New York

2018 Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGrasse_Tyson

The often reproduced image of rats with large tumors came from the fake scientist fraud Seralini. How dishonest can you get? The Seralini quack has been completely debunked and ejected from the scientific community for his lies about GMOs and rats. For starters, he used a species of lab rat known to always grow many tumors by age one no matter what it is fed! His fake ‘lab’ in France was funded by organic industry money. The EU launched a massive campaign 6 years ago to either verify or disprove all of Seralini’s claims from his organic farmer funded fake lab in France. Results? Not a single claim could be verified or reproduced, all study methods were found to be extremely faulty and misleading. Seralini will go down in history as the top anti-GMO fraud of this century! https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2019/02/20/seralini-pseudoscience-syndicate-lessons-learned-from-decade-long-assault-on-biotechnology-orchestrated-by-french-geneticist/ https://gmoinfo.eu/eu/news.php?news=BLOG-Misinformation-is-the-only-poison-the-end-of-the-Seralini-Affair

https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2018/06/european-studies-disprove-seralinis-gmo-maize-tumor-claims/

http://bioscriptionblog.com/2018/12/18/eu-refutation-seralini-anti-gmo/ https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-seralini-gmo-study-retraction-and-response-to-critics/

1. Corporations have a history of lying and hiding the truth to maximize profits.
2. Government agencies have a revolving door with industry, so officials look the other way.
3. The public has lost trust in corporations and governments for good reasons.
4. Corporations lobbying against GMO labeling undermines consumer choice and trust.

Thank you for the info about BHT, I actually decided today not to buy the gluten free brown rice crispys cereal because it says BHT in the ingredients, so you helped me. Thanks ����

just a bee keeper that did that with the leaves you have not and i do not piss up ropes ty

Thank goodness FDA and EPA testing of foods no longer finds dangerous levels of Atrazine, paraquat, DDT, fludioxonil, metolaclor, acephate and diazinon. Now they find minute traces of the least toxic herbicide ever formulated, glyphosate, which is 43% less toxic than table salt, and Bt, so non-toxic that organic farmers rely on it heavily. WHAT A DRAMATIC IMPROVEMENT!!!! Anti-GMO idiots claim they want to go back to that nightmare list of much more toxic pesticides. Why???? I can’t imagine.

Small veg farmer here. Was just watching this vid before going out to pick my summer squash. Passed my first tomato planting on the way and no surprise, all the leaves are succumbing to disease pressure as a result of recent heavy rains and now high temps and humidity. I’m all for GMOs to fight insects and disease but it certainly needs to be done wisely with best of intentions in mind, not corporate greed running the show. Human consciousness needs to evolve right along with the science. Thanks for an open minded look. I’m so tired of listening to people who’ve never held a hoe in their life, let alone raised a garden, espouse know it all opinions about growing food.

GMO is a laboratory breeding method for seeds. It is never under any circumstances an actual food ingredient just as hybridization, grafting and seed selection are not food ingredients Lying organic thug trolls will try to use fear mongering to convince you GMO sourced foods are not as safe when in fact they are far safer. What is not tested, ever, for safety?? Organic, heirloom, hybrid and new truck farm breeds. They go straight to store shelves with zero testing and YOU are the guinea pig. Look at what has happened because of this fact that never happened with GMO foods: “A year ago[2003] in New Zealand, there was an outbreak of food poisoning from a “killer zucchini” that hospitalized a number of people. Environmentalists jumped all over the story until it was determined that the culprit was “organic” zucchini. Plants are chemical factories that produce a multitude of toxins that protect them. An outbreak of aphid infestation had minimal impact on conventionally grown zucchini. The more vulnerable “organic” zucchini was genetically inferior because of inbreeding. They expressed dangerously high levels of the toxin curcubitan. Had this been a transgenic plant, we would be hearing about it ad nauseam, but being that it was “organic,” it was quickly consigned to an Orwellian memory hole.” http://www.uh.edu/trdegreg/genetic_engineering_not_significantly.htm

Organic industry tyranny for 32 years and counting: “Although GMOs are regarded as safe as their conventional counterparts by every major food safety authority in the world, the organic industry spends nearly $3 billion a year through over 330 different organizations leading with fear and “information spin” as an industry to sell their products. By creating an unfounded fear that requires tighter regulations on GMO crops, they are hoping to force them out of the food supply, thereby creating a bigger market share to sell more products in their more than $65 billion wheelhouse.

The unfortunate consequence of these [non-GMO] labels is that the food companies and lobbyists tend to create an unnecessary “us vs. them” divide. When food companies use fear against competitors to sell a product, farmers take it personally.”

https://www.agdaily.com/insights/farm-babe-label-trends-end/

Now why do you suppose organic food is so expensive?? Imagine what 3 billion dollars could do for humanitarian goals end a different disease forever every year…. End all hunger in at least one country…… Funding nasty propaganda? Really??

FDA launches “Feed Your Mind” website to educate about GE foods

“On March 4, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched its “Feed Your Mind” website, which is the first public-facing product from the $7.5 million that Congress appropriated starting in 2017 for an agricultural biotechnology education and outreach initiative. According to the FDA, the initiative’s goal is to “share science-based information that educates, informs and broadens understanding about agricultural biotechnology for consumers.” Congress (and the special interests that lobbied for the appropriation) clearly intended to use the authoritative voice of the FDA to increase consumer understanding of agricultural biotechnology and correct misconceptions and misinformation.

The initiative’s website includes fact sheets, infographics and videos. It will be followed later this year and in 2021 by additional materials for middle school classrooms, resources for health professionals and consumer materials.

In reviewing “Feed Your Mind,” one finds information that is scientifically accurate (with reliable references) and relatively easy for a non-scientist to understand. If you know nothing about GMOs and read the website’s contents, you will clearly be better informed about what GMOs are, although not necessarily about why GMOs have been so controversial. The question that remains is how this website (which is not easy to find from the FDA’s homepage, nor does it quickly appear when entering basic questions about GMOs into an internet search engine) will educate a significant segment of American consumers.

Will the FDA promote the website and its materials through an ad campaign? Will they send emails or postcards to Americans telling them to visit the website? I cannot imagine that the average American consumer visits FDA’s website with any great frequency. One can reasonably assume that the number of consumers who will search for the “Feed Your Mind” website, even if they know it exists, will be extremely small. So far, the FDA has only announced the website to its list of stakeholders. Much more outreach will be needed if the information they have generated is to have the impact Congress intended.” Article source: https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2020/05/06/us-government-launches-gmo-website-may-allow-gm-crops-in-some-wildlife-refuges/ FDA site link: https://www.fda.gov/food/consumers/agricultural-biotechnology?utm_campaign=CFSANCU_FeedYourMind_03042020&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua

You should make a video on Monsanto as well as Bayer of the Nazi pharmaceutical company

GMOs are being protested in some countries but in Uttarakhand ( india ) we really need the GMOs

That goes against what GMO are made for so they don’t have to be coted with glycosides.

People Strongly Against GMOs Had Shakier Understanding Of Food Science, Study Finds Jan 26, 2019 “People who most intensely oppose genetically modified food think they know a lot about food science, but they actually know the least, according to a peer-reviewed paper published in January in the journal Nature Human Behaviour.

GMOs are widely considered safe by scientists, but opponents have said they want more science on the potential harm so that subjective arguments aren’t part of the equation. However, previous surveys have shown that providing more scientific facts about GMOs to people doesn’t change their minds.

The survey, conducted by four universities, asked 2,000 people in Europe and the United States how much they knew about genetically modified food, what their opinion was and how intense it was.” Read the full coverage at: https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/01/26/687852367/people-strongly-against-gmos-had-shakier-understanding-of-food-science-study-fin

“Biotech news coverage in English-language Russian media fits the profile of the Russian information warfare strategy described in recent military reports. This raises the question of whether Russia views the dissemination of anti-GMO information as just one of many divisive issues it can exploit as part of its information war, or if GMOs serve more expansive disruptive purposes. Distinctive patterns in Russian news provide evidence of a coordinated information campaign that could turn public opinion against genetic engineering. The recent branding of Russian agriculture as the ecologically clean alternative to genetically engineered foods is suggestive of an economic motive behind the information campaign against western biotechnologies. Concurrent with our investigation, there has been considerable popular debate about Russian meddling in western elections and the role that social media and online news may have played in these efforts. The accumulated evidence indicates that Russia is targeting western democracies with an ‘influence campaign’ drawing from a large number of seemingly unrelated social, political, economic, and environmental topics. According to recent declassified assessments by military agencies, this represents a new and more sophisticated asymmetrical war in which Russia is alleged to exploit a network of state-funded news agencies, trolls, bots, and activists to encourage dissent and polarize the electorate in service of eroding trust in western institutions (e.g., elections, government officials and regulatory agencies, capitalism, and an independent press6,7 and National Intelligence Council 2016). To date, much of the attention in the US has been on the use of social media giants Facebook and Twitter to spread highly polarizing, ideologically extreme, and conspiratorial propaganda.8 Although there has been less attention paid to the sources of disinformation campaigns,9 two Russian state-funded news organizations, RT (Russia Today) and Sputnik, were singled out by defense agencies as central actors in this influence campaign. Indeed, the US version of RT was recently directed under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, a post-World War II law aimed at preventing foreign influence from affecting US policy, to register with the Justice Department as a foreign agent. Twitter recently banned RT and Sputnik from purchasing advertisements on their network and more recently closed the accounts of several thousand accounts linked to Russian foreign intelligence operations. Other social media outlets, such as Reddit, have recently taken similar action.

We found that RT and Sputnik produced more articles containing the word ‘GMO’ (53%) than the other five news organizations combined (Fig. 1). RT accounted for 34% of the articles we collected, followed by Sputnik (19%), Huffington Post (18%), Fox News (15%), CNN (8%), Breitbart News (6%), and MSNBC (<1%). Article classification revealed that RT and Sputnik consistently portrayed genetic modification in a negative light. Among US news organizations, the left-leaning Huffington Post produced the most ‘anti’ articles, followed by CNN. Fox News produced the most mixed or neutral coverage of GMOs. Nearly all articles in which the term GMO appeared as ‘click bait’ were published by RT. These findings implicate Russian News as an important, if largely unknown, purveyor of anti-GMO information."

Many more details, and 17 footnote citations of proof, here: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645698.2018.1454192

All modern produce is gmo, none of it resembles anything they used to look like.

ohh dear god…. roundup does not kill bugs, it kills weeds. Please educate yourself. The plant does not kill weeds, Glyphosate does, but it wont kill the corn, because corn is immune to it. Bacteria in the soil will break down Glyphosate.

Please stop fear mongering, and get the basics right at least.

To me the biggest problem with GMOs is that they greatly reduce the genetic diversity of crops. Since all seeds come from a lab they are almost clones of each other and are more likely to suffer from a pandemic.
This is a big issue because the potato famine happened exactly because all potatoes were clones. Potatoes are reproduced by planting last year’s potatoes, not from seeds, thus not benefiting from sexual reproduction. GMOs have the exact same problem, and the ownership these companies have over the seeds ensures it will stay that way.

Seriously? “The Russians” are trying to make GMOs look evil by posting memes… I thought this was REAL science…

Cava and Hope are two brands of hummus that have good ingredients. Cava my first favorite and Hope is my second

WARNING Wheat is Always GMO!! I don’t really know where he Got that it isn’t! There are Dr’s way older then him speaking about GMO and how when their Families farmed the wheat was way different don’t Believe what he is saying about the wheat!

JUST STÓP LYING!! GMO,S WILL KILL YOU!! USE YOUR BRAIN!!! GENETICALLY…WOW…NEW WORLD ORDER…HOW MUCH DID THEY PAY YOU TO LIE???

Gmos products are one of bill gates and company for world depopulation

Erik Osterling: The link takes you to an 80-page document, produced by the UN Codex Commission on GMO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/a1554e/a1554e00.htm It includes many safety protocols that GMO Corporate has actively been AVOIDING: This successful AVOIDANCE OF INTERNATIONAL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS has made them $ Billions from a product that is an EXPERIMENTAL FOOD SOURCE IN HUMANS. That’s right, Erik, GMO Food-safety is scientifically UNTESTED in Humans, ever since sales were approved in 1996 in the US!!
Click the link, download the pdf, read it….Get some REAL SCIENCE FACTS about GMO Foods.

Will GMO’s produce seed that will grow next year’s crop? Will GMO’s fertilise a neighbouring field of non-GMO plants, leading to the extinction of non-GMO’s? Why develop a rice with carotene for a people who rarely have oil to mix with the rice, and so cannot absorb the vit A?

Another thing he is wrong about, is the beef and dairy cattle are not fed just corn silage. They are put out on pasture 85% of the time and when the get sent to the feed lot that’s when they feed grain and it actually provides better taste and marbling, farmers have to pay someone to buy grain as feed, but they can put cows on pasture for free, what he says just doesn’t make sense and his ignorance in the field shows.

We need GMO’S like we need another hole in our head. The first problem is CORPORATE ownership of seeds, just trust us its perfectly safe look at all the science we have backing up our claims. The second problem is CORPORATIONS claiming its their job to feed us. The third problem is what they are calling science isn’t objective its subjective and carefully crafted to reach the predrawn conclusion the CORPORATION intended before the first study was done.

And the CORPORATE interests are getting nervous and have begun to push the bigger AGENDA 21/2030 that strips all people of their natural born rights. Whenever you hear SUSTAINABILITY, CLIMATE CONTROL, GMO’S, UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME and that all those things are “needed” and endorsed by SCIENCE you are being lied too. It wasn’t too long ago these same mad scientists proposed LOBOTOMYS as the answer and these hacks today are no different. All their answers are a contradiction to Nature.

All the problems we are facing today begin and end at their doorstep. Like it or not we are going to have to deal with these terrorists and the sooner the better for all of us.

White rice doesn’t contain micronutrients? I mean it does but okay…

This is why you should have to pass a tough logic test before being allowed to vote, all these idiots having a voice are setting the world back. It’s the same people who care about nuclear energy of lab grown meats. We need an absolute monarchy where people have no social place in politics.

My name is Pawan Ramnarain. I want to remind readers of all the huge advantages of GMO crops:
1) The thing about GMOs is that they have been so completely tested clinically and by government safety agencies.
2) All research done is peer reviewed and findings are supported by all legitimate science organizations globally.
3) Companies that produce GMOs are a gift to humanity. NGOs run by the the smartest people on this planet also invest in GMO seed to be given away free to the poorest farmers. Farmers welcome this help graciously.
4) GMOs are the most affordable because they allow us to skip pesticide and herbicide use and avoid personal contamination by pesticides that are not applied thanks to modern crop science.
5) The pros mentioned in this video can not be achieved by conventional breeding so I respect that. We now achieve goals in better seed that was impossible before.
6) People are too poorly educated to understand modern crop science so we rely on our crop scientists to get the seed we desperately need.
7) People have stopped the bogus lawsuits because we learned it was a scam made possible by a huge bribe of organic lobby money delivered to the IARC.
I can keep going on with this list to show you why people are embracing GMOs due to all their advantages. But hey, farmers have the right to fail so there is no pressure. I’m glad for the new perfect plant based replacements for meats like beef, this is a sustainable move we have to make.

I read in a book called “Lifespan” by David Sinclair that said, like most new discoveries that were brought to the masses way too early, is that the average person’s understanding of these new developments is limited to none, and that alone can inspire fear. Also, the term GMO has been ingrained in a massive part of the world’s population, not by years education and slow integration, but by the media, and in a very negative way. I feel like there’s a fine line between wanting to push new tech into the world asap vs spending time to slowly educate the world and waiting for these things to become common knowledge in order to avoid misunderstanding and irrational fear.
Now we’re faced with an even greater problem of having to REeducate the world, which is difficult in and of itself, let alone having to deal with the millions of people who are hell-bent on destroying everything about GMOs.

We love you Art….but hope someday (after knowing how coke and other things are poisoning your body), you will love your self enough to quit eating the crap food!!! Said with love, because we want you around for a long time!!! ��

Great video..thank you..only thing left in my fridge is some strawberries..

https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2016/05/gmo-safety-debate-is-over/

Corn and Soy are NOT modified with roundup. Roundup is a chemical herbicide not a pesticide. It has no genetics so it can’t be included in the plant dna. The plants may be modified to be resistant to roundup, but roundup, once again, a chemical, is NOT part of the plant genetics. Get your facts straight before talking crap.

Creamy Jif peanut butter, claims on their label that they are Non-GMO, but list ingredients (less than 2%) ” fully hydrogenated vegetable oils, rapeseed and soybean”.
How can the manufacturers of Jif claim that Jif is non-GMO?

Calling all Mashable subscribers and readers note I will increase my daily calling out of invasive hate trolls until this stops. Mashable fans and science respecting educated adults who hate trolls and malicious liars Join me in reporting the anti-science GMO hater troll ‘Almost but Not Entirely Unreasonable’ who is in fact mentally ill. Let’s not allow hater trolls and malicious liar stalkers to take over this venue. Whether they are Russian spammers, Greenpeace activists or organic industry operatives the result is the same. If you sort for newest and scroll down you will see just how bad this infection is. We welcome debate but not liars with ulterior motives that insult the integrity of our hard working farmers and scientists. Flag him for spam or cyber bullying and report his channel because the shitty, practically non-existent moderation scheme in G+ has no specific button for reporting stalkers or malicious trolls. Mashable works on your behalf to post the truth, don’t let trolls get away with trying to discredit the effort. To report these trolls, click on their channels, locate the flag button and report them for cyber bullying or spam or both. Copy this page’s address into the complaint form and click it.

Wonderfully done educational production. Smooth sponsor transition. However the mention of Russian propaganda to defame GMOs is a bit on the nail, it would cause an quick bias for many american viewers due to politics so that part I wouldn’t have used but overall great video.

The FDA has allowed farmers to feed their animals corn and call the meat grass fed,providing the starch is removed from the corn and of course the corn is GM corn. By the way the german co. BAYER now own MONSANTO and are selling Roundup in Europe after it waas banned there for years.

What do you think of possibly using genetic modification techniques like crispr on humans?

anyone have some sources for Pamela Ronald’s comments? need for a report

I’m glad that Bobby acknowledges that GMOs aren’t inherently bad. GMO technology can be used to do good things, even make foods more nutritious, unlike what Monsanto is doing.

Thanks Bobby very informative video I’m in the store examining all nutritional information and labels

The rich, wealthy, those who sell them and those who can afford to adjust their budget and buy organic do not buy GMOs they buy real food for their families. But the millions who can’t afford it and are poor are experimented on for the benefit of the big companies. All this while those on top know all along of the dangers. People must eat so they eat what they can afford. Sad facts.